<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"><url><loc>https://andrewsellek.com/research-themes/</loc><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/mirlineemissivities_mdot-8.png</image:loc><image:title>MIRLineEmissivities_Mdot-8</image:title></image:image><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/compare_jwsta.png</image:loc><image:title>compare_JWSTA</image:title><image:caption>Comparison of models of [Ne II] and [Ar II] in a wind before and after PSF convolution, and with observations.</image:caption></image:image><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/hwhm_data_comparison_near_mean_2d.png</image:loc><image:title>HWHM_data_comparison_NeAr_mean_2D</image:title><image:caption>Relationship between the emission extent of [Ar II] and [Ne II] for different models.</image:caption></image:image><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/major_h_major_c_major_o_20000.png</image:loc><image:title>major_H_major_C_major_O_20000</image:title><image:caption>The composition of the wind. The wind can have significant molecular content, especially in H2 due to advection – the chemistry is out of equilibrium.</image:caption></image:image><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/rho_tgas_deltat_20000.png</image:loc><image:title>rho_Tgas_deltaT_20000</image:title><image:caption>The density and temperature structure of the wind. Compared to previous models, we find a larger temperature gradient, stabilised by the presence of H2.</image:caption></image:image><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/mdot_comparison_xray.png</image:loc><image:title>Mdot_comparison_Xray</image:title><image:caption>Mass-loss rates in a photoevaporative wind, comparing a literature model with two on-the-fly thermochemical calcualtions with different X-ray spectra.</image:caption></image:image><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/profile_evolution.png</image:loc><image:title>profile_evolution</image:title><image:caption>The profile of the new mass-loss rate prescriptions across the disc.</image:caption></image:image><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2panels_calibrationexample.png</image:loc><image:title>2panels_calibrationExample</image:title><image:caption>If a dust "traffic jam" develops inside the water snowline, the measureable water column densities could be insensitive to the true amount of water.</image:caption></image:image><image:image><image:loc>https://andrewsellek.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/6panels_scenario1evolution.png</image:loc><image:title>6panels_scenario1evolution</image:title><image:caption>The evolution of the H2O and CO2 in disc models with dust traps.</image:caption></image:image><lastmod>2025-11-09T23:37:20+00:00</lastmod><changefreq>weekly</changefreq><priority>0.6</priority></url><url><loc>https://andrewsellek.com</loc><changefreq>daily</changefreq><priority>1.0</priority><lastmod>2025-11-09T23:37:20+00:00</lastmod></url></urlset>
